3/10/2024 0 Comments Leaving the iba primerica online![]() The seventh cause of action is asserted against all defendants for adverse employment action in violation of Administrative Code § 8-1-101 et seq. ![]() The sixth cause of action is asserted against all defendants for adverse employment action in violation of the Executive Law. The fifth cause of action is asserted against all defendants for failing to provide a non-discriminatory work environment in violation of Administrative Code § 8-1-101 et seq. The fourth cause of action is asserted against all defendants for failing to provide a non-discriminatory work environment in violation of the Executive Law § 296 et seq. The third cause of action is asserted against the Primerica defendants for negligent hiring and supervision of Brian Ortiz. The second cause of action is asserted against the Primerica defendants for, inter alia, negligence and vicarious liability for the conduct of Brian Ortiz. The first cause of action is asserted against Brian Ortiz for physical battery, including non-consensual sexual intercourse. The verified complaint alleges one hundred and seven allegations of fact in support of ten denominated causes of action. On March 22, 2022, plaintiff filed a verified complaint. Poch, Primerica Financial Services Agency of New York, Inc., Primerica, Inc., Primerica Financial Services, LLC, Primerica Life Insurance Company, and PFS Investments, Inc. made a demand for a complaint on behalf of defendants Brian Ortiz, Richard P. ![]() ![]() (hereinafter after plaintiff) commenced the instant action by filing a summons with notice with the Kings County Clerk's office. Affirmation in Further Reply by plaintiff (MS No. Affirmation in Further Support of MS No. Memorandum of Law in Further Support of MS No. Affirmation in Reply by Plaintiff (MS No. Affirmation in Support of the Plaintiff's Cross Motion (MS No. Affidavit in Opposition by Plaintiff to MS No. Notice of Cross Motion by Plaintiff (MS No. Affidavit in Support (MS No.2) filed on (hereinafter plaintiff) has opposed the motion. § 1 et seq., and Civil Practice Law and Rules §§ 7503 (a) and 3211 (a) (1) and (7), to dismiss or, alternatively, stay the action and compel arbitration of the claims asserted in plaintiff's verified complaint, and for all costs and fees associated with bringing the instant motion. Poch, Primerica Financial Services Agency of New York, Inc., Primerica, Inc.,Primerica Financial Services, LLC, Primerica Life Insurance Company, and PFS Investments Inc., (hereinafter collectively as "the moving defendants" or "Primerica defendants") for an order pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Recitation in accordance with CPLR 2219 (a) of the papers considered on the notice of motion jointly filed on April 11, 2022, under motion sequence number two (hereinafter MS No.), by defendants Richard P. POCH, PRIMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES AGENCY OF NEW YORK, INC., PRIMERICA, INC., PRIMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and PFS INVESTMENTS INC., Defendants. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.īrian Ortiz, RICHARD P. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |